All items from Shenwick & Associates

By The anemic economy has left millions of younger working Americans struggling to get ahead. The added millstone of student loan debt, which recently exceeded $1 trillion in total, is making it even harder for many of them, delaying purchases of things like homes, cars and other big-ticket items and acting as a drag on growth, economists said.
Consider Shane Gill, a 33-year-old high-school teacher in New York City. He does not have a car. He does not own a home. He is not married. And he is no anomaly: like hundreds of thousands of others in his generation, he has put off such major purchases or decisions in part because of his debts.



Posted 1 week 3 days ago

Posted 8 weeks 1 day ago

At Shenwick & Associates, we often get questions from clients if they may transfer a house from one spouse to another after being sued or prior to a bankruptcy filing:An upstate bankruptcy court addressed this question and held that such a transfer could be a fraudulent conveyance and set aside. The name of the case was In re Tina M. Panepinto, 12-11230. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District 12-11230In In re Tina M. Panepinto,  a wife  who was insolvent owned a wholly-exempt homestead (house) free-and-clear, and (without consideration) transferred her half ownership to her husband.  The bankruptcy court held that an existing creditor could sustain an action to set that transfer aside as a fraudulent conveyance under New York State law. Records show that in 2008, with a bill collector seeking to collect a debt, Panepinto transferred half the ownership of her home to her husband. Four years later, she filed for bankruptcy. Creditors challenged the bankruptcy petition, seeking to set aside the transfer of real property as a fraudulent conveyance under New York Debtor and Creditor Law §273. The Bankruptcy Judge sustained the creditors challenge.



Posted 9 weeks 6 days ago

In In re Pamela Persaud, case No. 12-43602-CEC, US Bankruptcy Court, EDNY, February 4, 2013 involved the Means Test, the presumption of abuse and what expenses can be deducted in calculating the Means Test. On Line 17 of the Means Test, the Debtor deducted $5,742.19 form the total monthly income as a "marital adjustment", which she claimed is income of her husband that was not regularly contributed for household expenses. The United States Trustee contended that tuition payments for the couples children were household expenses and should have been counted as a Debtor's income in the means test calculation. The Bankruptcy Judge provided that income of a non-filing spouse can be excluded only to the extent it is not regularly contributed to household expenses. An expense paid by the non-debtor spouse will be considered a household expense and thus included in income on the means test, unless the expense is purely personal to the non-debtor spouse. The Debtor's position was that since the tuition was paid for solely by the non-filing husband who was contractually liable, from his separate monies, those expenses should not be considered household expenses. The Bankruptcy Judge disagreed citing section 101(10A)(b) of the Bankruptcy Code which provides that income includes any amount paid by any entity other than the debtor... on a regular basis for the household expenses of the debtor or the debtor' dependents. The Means Test is an extremely complex calculation and debtor's must use extreme care and caution when making those calculations. Jim



Posted 11 weeks 2 days ago

In re Mary Veronica Santiago-Monteverde No. 11-15494 (JMP) SDNY April 10, 2012,  is another case where a bankruptcy judge in the Southern District of New York held that a bankruptcy trustee was allowed to sell a debtor's rent stabilized lease to her landlord. Ms. Mary Veronica Santiago-Monteverde  lived in the East Village, in New York and after she filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy, her landlord, East 7th Street Development Corp. made an offer to the Bankruptcy Trustee to purchase her interest in the lease. The bankruptcy trustee agreed to sell the lease and the Debtor objected to the sale holding that she was entitled to exempt the value of her rent stabilized lease as a "public assistance benefit" within the meaning of section 282(2) of the New York Debtor and Creditor law. In New York, exempt property in a bankruptcy case is governed by New York State Debtor Creditor law. The bankruptcy judge rejected Ms. Santiago-Monteverde's argument and the rent stabilized lease was sold to the landlord. The bankruptcy judge in his opinion stated that it is undisputed that a rent-stabilized lease is property of the estate and that the Bankruptcy Trustee may assume or reject any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.



Posted 11 weeks 2 days ago

Pension money that is in a tax qualified pension plan such a Roth or IRA may be kept in a chapter 7 personal bankruptcy, provided that it does not exceed $1,171,650. Pension money is a 401(k), 403(b), SEP or a defined benefit plan, in any amount, is exempt in bankruptcy and may not be taken or seized by a bankuptcy trustee.



Posted 11 weeks 5 days ago

In New York a debtor can file bankruptcy and keep 1 car that has no more than $4,000 of equity. If the car or automobile is new or has a loan, equity is calculated by taking the difference between the value of the car and the outstanding loan against the car. To determine the value of a car, a debtor can get a letter from an automobile dealer appraising the car or use the Kelly Blue book values



Posted 11 weeks 5 days ago