All items from Bankruptcy and Restructuring Law Monitor

We apologize, but our New Jersey telecommunication systems remain adversely affected and are currently not functioning.  This includes phone, voicemail and fax communication.  Thus, if you need to contact anyone at our NJ office, please click here for an attachment containing all of our attorneys’ mobile phone numbers
You may also access our attorneys’ phones numbers on our website.
Alternatively, you may also dial 212-752-8000 for our New York main line, where our Client Service Representative will direct your call accordingly.
All of our offices are open and operational.
Again, and most importantly, we truly wish our best to everyone.



Posted 27 weeks 4 days ago

Dear clients, friends and neighbors,

We realize that in this difficult aftermath of the storm, many of our clients, friends and neighbors are dealing with issues where we may be able to present some relief.
We are very fortunate to have power and Internet in our New Jersey, New York, Delaware and Maryland offices.  For anyone who needs it, we would like to offer you the ability to use our conference rooms to charge your devices, check email or other important areas of your life that you are unable to access.
We very much realize that these are tumultuous times.  It is our utmost hope that we may be able to help alleviate some of the pain and trouble experienced by the people and families we care about.  Please do not hesitate to contact Gayle Englert, Director of Human Resources, at genglert@coleschotz.com or 201-320-2766, if you would like to make use of our facilities.  We will do our very best to accommodate everyone we possibly can.
Also, we hope that you may find the below list of important numbers and services to be helpful.



Posted 28 weeks 18 hours ago

All of our offices are open, however, we are experiencing problems with telephone communication in New Jersey.  If you need to contact anyone in our New Jersey office via telephone, please dial our New York main line at 212-752-8000. Our Client Service Representative will then direct your call accordingly.  You may also reach our attorneys... Continue Reading



Posted 28 weeks 1 day ago

We are in the process of restoring computer systems which we hope to have completed shortly. In the meantime, your attorney can be reached via cell phone. If you do not have their cell phone number, please call Gayle Englert, Director of Human Resources, at (201) 320-2766.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.



Posted 28 weeks 3 days ago

In an opinion that has wide-ranging implications for the structured finance industry, the Delaware bankruptcy court recently dismissed a mezzanine borrower’s chapter 11 case as a bad faith filing pursuant to section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.  In re JER/Jameson Mezz Borrower II, LLC, No. 11-13338, 2011 WL 6749058 (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 22, 2011).  At the core of the motion to dismiss were allegations that the debtor had filed for bankruptcy in bad faith, solely to benefit the lender to a parent entity, and to the detriment of the debtor’s lender.  The opinion stands in contrast to In re General Growth Properties, Inc., 409 B.R. 43 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009) (“GGP”), and may leave structurally senior lenders breathing a sigh of relief.
Facts and Procedural History



Posted 1 year 16 weeks ago

In an opinion that has wide-ranging implications for the structured finance industry, the Delaware bankruptcy court recently dismissed a mezzanine borrower’s chapter 11 case as a bad faith filing pursuant to section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.  In re JER/Jameson Mezz Borrower II, LLC, No. 11-13338, 2011 WL 6749058 (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 22, 2011).  At the core of the motion to dismiss were allegations that the debtor had filed for bankruptcy in bad faith, solely to benefit the lender to a parent entity, and to the detriment of the debtor’s lender.  The opinion stands in contrast to In re General Growth Properties, Inc., 409 B.R. 43 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009) (“GGP”), and may leave structurally senior lenders breathing a sigh of relief.
Facts and Procedural History



Posted 1 year 16 weeks ago

The Delaware Supreme Court recently held that creditors lack standing to bring a derivative suit on behalf of an insolvent Delaware limited liability company (an “LLC”) under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “LLC Act”).  CML V, LLC v. Bax, No. 735, 2011 WL 3863132 (Del. Sept. 2, 2011, corrected Sept. 6, 2011).  In an opinion written by Chief Justice Steele, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of claims brought by a junior secured creditor against the LLC’s present and former officers directly and derivatively for breaching their fiduciary duties.  The Delaware Supreme Court’s holding was based on a plain reading of 6 Del. C. § 18-1002 which requires that a plaintiff be a “member” or an “assignee” of a limited liability company interest to bring a derivative action on behalf of an LLC. 
Facts and Procedural History



Posted 1 year 34 weeks ago

The Delaware Supreme Court recently held that creditors lack standing to bring a derivative suit on behalf of an insolvent Delaware limited liability company (an “LLC”) under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “LLC Act”).  CML V, LLC v. Bax, No. 735, 2011 WL 3863132 (Del. Sept. 2, 2011, corrected Sept. 6, 2011).  In an opinion written by Chief Justice Steele, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of claims brought by a junior secured creditor against the LLC’s present and former officers directly and derivatively for breaching their fiduciary duties.  The Delaware Supreme Court’s holding was based on a plain reading of 6 Del. C. § 18-1002 which requires that a plaintiff be a “member” or an “assignee” of a limited liability company interest to bring a derivative action on behalf of an LLC. 
Facts and Procedural History



Posted 1 year 34 weeks ago

The Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (Kaplan, J.) recently held that hotel revenues (including revenues generated from room occupancy, food and beverage sales, catering, gift shop purchases, spa, and related hotel services) do not constitute “rent” within the meaning of the Third Circuit decision of In re Jason Realty, L.P., 59 F.3d 423 (3d Cir.



Posted 2 years 1 week ago

The Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (Kaplan, J.) recently held that hotel revenues (including revenues generated from room occupancy, food and beverage sales, catering, gift shop purchases, spa, and related hotel services) do not constitute “rent” within the meaning of the Third Circuit decision of In re Jason Realty, L.P., 59 F.3d 423 (3d Cir. 1995).  Therefore, even if they are absolutely assigned to the secured lender, hotel revenues can be used by the debtor as cash collateral to pay its ordinary and necessary operating expenses and to reorganize.  In re Ocean Place Dev., LLC, No. 11-14295 (Bankr. D.N.J. Mar. 31, 2011).



Posted 2 years 1 week ago